html - Making Image Overlay more responsive? -


is there way of making overlay more responsive? in, making overlay not cut off words, or go outside image when resolution changes?

to further clarify: having 3 images next each other in row, per w3css framework using, 3 images under that, etc. each image has overlay text links direct other pages, shown in example below. issue responsiveness. want images, , overlays, responsive screen size changes , resolution.

thank you!

.container {  	position: relative;  	width: 50%;  }    .image {  	display: block;  	width: 100%;  	height: auto;  }    .overlay {  	position: absolute;  	top: 0;  	bottom: 0;  	left: 0;  	right: 0;  	height: 100%;  	width: 100%;  	opacity: 0;  	transition: .5s ease;  	background-color: #008cba;  }    .container:hover .overlay {  	opacity: 1;  }    .text {  	color: white;  	font-size: 15px;  	position: absolute;  	top: 50%;  	left: 50%;  	transform: translate(-50%, -50%);  	-ms-transform: translate(-50%, -50%);  }
<link href="https://www.w3schools.com/w3css/4/w3.css" rel="stylesheet"/>    <div class="w3-row-padding">      <div class="w3-third w3-container w3-margin-bottom">          <div class="container">              <img src="https://www.google.com/images/branding/product/ico/googleg_lodp.ico" alt="google" style="height:300px;width:400px" class="w3-hover-opacity">               <div class="overlay">                  <div class="text">                      <a href="https://www.google.com">google sample1</a><br>                      <a href="https://www.google.com">googlesample2</a><br>                  </div>              </div>          </div>          <div class="w3-container w3-white" style="height:50px;width:400px">              <h3>example 1</h3>          </div>      </div>  </div>

to make sure, image same width parent, better use not width = 100% property, min-width = 100% , max-width = 100% too. if want keep dimensions of image, should point height = auto, in case should height = auto !important. , breaking long words in overlay, have added following rules:

overflow-wrap: break-word; word-wrap: break-word; word-break: break-all; word-break: break-word; hyphens: auto;

here working snippet:

.container {    position: relative;    width: 50%;  }    .image {    display: block;    width: 100%;    min-width: 100%;    max-width: 100%;    height: auto !important;  }    .overlay {    position: absolute;    top: 0;    bottom: 0;    left: 0;    right: 0;    height: 100%;    width: 100%;    opacity: 0;    transition: .5s ease;    background-color: #008cba;        overflow-wrap: break-word;    word-wrap: break-word;    word-break: break-all;    word-break: break-word;    hyphens: auto;  }    .container:hover .overlay {    opacity: 1;  }    .text {    color: white;    font-size: 15px;    position: absolute;    top: 50%;    left: 50%;    transform: translate(-50%, -50%);    -ms-transform: translate(-50%, -50%);  }
<div class="w3-row-padding">    <div class="w3-third w3-container w3-margin-bottom">      <div class="container">        <img src="https://www.google.com/images/branding/product/ico/googleg_lodp.ico" alt="google" style="height:300px;width:400px" class="w3-hover-opacity image"></a>        <div class="overlay">          <div class="text">            <a href="https://www.google.com">google sample1</a><br>            <a href="https://www.google.com">googlesample2</a><br>          </div>        </div>      </div>      <div class="w3-container w3-white" style="height:50px;width:400px">        <h3>example 1</h3>      </div>  </div>


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more