reactjs - Polymer with Top-down Pattern -


i trying replace react polymer reduce js/jsx , use more html.

in react, element receives props, , sends out sub-props children this:

// pseudocode  export class parent extends react.component {   render() {     return (       <child a={this.props.a} b={this.prop.b} />       <child a={this.props.c} b={this.prop.d} />     );   } }

in polymer, in same way, want root polymer element have large state tree, , give subtrees children. started replacing leaf react components polymer components.

// pseudocode  export class parent extends react.component {   render() {     return (       <child a={json.stringify(this.props.a)} b=a={json.stringify(this.props.b)}/>       <child a={json.stringify(this.props.c)} b=a={json.stringify(this.props.d)}/>     );   } }  <dom-module id="child">   <template>     [[a.name]] said [[b.txt]]    </template>   <script>     polymer({       is: 'child',       properties: {         a: object,         b: object       }     });   </script> </dom-module>

this works, there potential inefficiencies worried about:

  1. when passing json objects web-component children, needs serialized json because dom attributes accept strings or boolean. wasteful marshalling. large object, react uses reference web componenets copy , keep object serialized json string. correct?

  2. html code shows huge json string embedded in tag, <child a='{... long json ...}' />. html code looks ugly, , attributes of leaf component stored in ancestors, same json string appears in html code many times. if dom tree has depth d, attribute repeated d times. correct?

  3. can avoid serialization , use references when parent web-component passes objects children?

  4. what right way apply global state tree web component tree? polymer efficiently work top-down pattern? can avoid bloatd-html?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more