typescript - rxJs Subject, error in subscriptions kills the whole stream -


i know known behavior desribed here

basic problem described in link above, here relevant code (taken link)

// going behave strangely const source$ = observable.interval(1000).share(); const mapped$ = source$.map(x => {   if (x === 1) {     throw new error('oops');   }   return x; }); source$.subscribe(x => console.log('a', x)); mapped$.subscribe(x => console.log('b', x)); source$.subscribe(x => console.log('c', x)); // "a" 0 // "b" 0 // "c" 0 // "a" 1 // uncaught error: "oops"

an error in subscription terminate whole source stream.

the solution observable use .observeon(rx.scheduler.asap);

i'm new whole reactive programming , struggle apply solution subject because subject doesn't support observeon.

but need subject because need push new values steam.

how can workaround problem or use observeon subject?

observeon returns observable. struggle how combine observeon subject. how use observeon , still able push values subject?

here's current code (simplified)

export class myclass{      private messages: subject<message> = new subject<message>();      dispatchmessage(message: message) {       this.messages.next(message); }

ideas?

p.s.

for using angular (like me), observeon might have undesired side effects. https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/14316

just additional information comes question.

in case need separate reference subject reference chain after append observeon operator:

const subject$ = new subject(); const obs$ = subject$.observeon(...);  obs$.subscribe(...); subject$.next(...);

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more