c - socket programming , bind() error -


my code have written server implementation not working. program cant bind() socket address , generate error.

code

#include<stdio.h> #include<unistd.h> #include<sys/types.h> #include<sys/socket.h> #include<netinet/in.h> #include<string.h> #include<stdlib.h> #include <netdb.h>  int main(int argc , char* argv[]) {     int socket_descriptor;     struct sockaddr_in server;     char buffer[512];     int rval;     int socket_a;      if(socket_descriptor = socket(af_inet, sock_stream , 0) < 0)     {         perror("error @ creating socket");         exit(1);     }      server.sin_family  = af_inet;     server.sin_addr.s_addr = inaddr_any;     server.sin_port = htons(5000);      if(bind(socket_descriptor,(struct sockaddr * )&server,sizeof(server)) < 0)     {         perror("error @ binding");         exit(1);     }  }

error

error @ binding: socket operation on non-socket .

here's problem:

if(socket_descriptor = socket(af_inet, sock_stream , 0) < 0)

the less-than operator < has higher precedence assignment operator =. above equivalent to:

if(socket_descriptor = (socket(af_inet, sock_stream , 0) < 0))

assuming socket succeeds, file descriptor returned not negative, comparison evaluate 0 (i.e. false) , value assigned socket_descriptor. , since file descriptor 0 stdin, error socket operation on non-socket.

adding proper set of parenthesis assign socket socket_descriptor:

if ((socket_descriptor = socket(af_inet, sock_stream , 0)) < 0)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more