c# - Why aren't these static constructors called in generic inherited types? -


this question has answer here:

here program not trigger static constructors though displays distinct owned static instances.

class program {     static void main(string[] args)     {         template.render();         template2.render();         console.writeline(referenceequals(template.factory, template2.factory));     } }  public class basetemplate<t> t : new() {     static basetemplate()     {         console.writeline("basetemplate() " + typeof(t).name);     }      public static object factory = new object();      public static void render()     {         console.writeline("render() " + typeof(t).name);     } }  public class template : basetemplate<template> {     static template()     {         console.writeline("static ctor()");     } }  public class template2 : basetemplate<template2> {     static template2()     {         console.writeline("static ctor() 2");     } }

the result

basetemplate() template render() template basetemplate() template2 render() template2 false

the goal here have custom instance of factory each sub-class, works fine, initialize in static constructor. can see factory instances distinct reference test, static constructors not called unless called system.runtime.compilerservices.runtimehelpers.runclassconstructor(typeof(t).typehandle);

then result following.

static ctor() basetemplate() template render() template static ctor() 2 basetemplate() template2 render() template2 false

from the documentation:

a static constructor used initialize static data, or perform particular action needs performed once only. called automatically before first instance created or static members referenced.

so trigger static ctor must either

  1. create instance of template or template2. example doesn't.

  2. call static member of template or template2. in example, neither class has static members (other ctor) aren't calling them.

if modify code:

template.render(); template2.render(); var o = new template(); var p = new template2(); console.writeline(referenceequals(template.factory, template2.factory));

the output is:

basetemplate() template render() template basetemplate() template2 render() template2 static ctor() static ctor() 2 false

with static methods there no inheritance (that requires vmt , therefore instance) chain static constructor calls this:

public class basetemplate<t> t : new() {     static basetemplate()     {         console.writeline("basetemplate() " + typeof(t).name);     }      public static object factory = new object();      public static void render()     {         console.writeline("render() basetemplate, " + typeof(t).name);     } }  public class template : basetemplate<template> {     static template()     {         console.writeline("static ctor()");     }      public static new void render()     {         console.writeline("render() template.");         basetemplate<template>.render();     } }  public class template2 : basetemplate<template2> {     static template2()     {         console.writeline("static ctor() 2");     }      public static new void render()     {         console.writeline("render() template2.");         basetemplate<template2>.render();     }  }

which has output:

static ctor() render() template. basetemplate() template render() basetemplate, template static ctor() 2 render() template2. basetemplate() template2 render() basetemplate, template2 false

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more