vert.x - Putting 2 millions objects in Hazelcast cluster of 5 nodes - what optimization we should do -


we have 2 millions objects coming rest api in chunks of 500 objects in each api call (apprx 750 mb of data in total).

  • when put these objects in hazelcast cache following takes around 10 minutes – cpu 5-6% - makes sense because there 2 million blocking n/w calls.

    vertx.executeblocking {     for(2 million times) {         hazelcast.put(mapname, key, value)     } }

  • when don’t use vertx’s “executeblocking” , rather following whole process finish in 10-15 seconds cpu reaches 80%. using hazelcast mancenter, see 2 millions objects reflected in cache within 10-15 seconds.

    for(2 million times) {     hazelcast.putasync(mapname, key, value) }

  • when used #putall following cpu reaches 60%, better second approach. approach finishes in apprx 10 seconds.

    for(2 million objects in chunks of 500) {     hazelcast.putall(mapname, collection-of-500-objects) }

any optimization guys recommend? wonder why hazelcast spiking cpu much.

fyi - think vertx.executeblocking executing piece of code asynchronously. using intel xeon 8 core cpu 12gb ram.

have @ imap.putall. allows putting data in chunks. said 2mln divided 500 objects chunk = 4k chunks

/**  * {@inheritdoc}  * <p>  *      no atomicity guarantees given. in case of failure  *      of key/value-pairs written, while others not.  * </p>  * <p>  *      <p><b>warning:</b></p>  *      if have set ttl key, ttl remains unchanged , entry  *      expire when initial ttl has elapsed.  * </p>  */ void putall(map<? extends k, ? extends v> m);

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more