javascript - How to make this piece of code asynchronous via promises? -


any glue. please not give example of settimeout.

my supervisor said unnecessary having more then() statement if then()'s not return new promise.i not completely, have looked @ exploring es6 there no example of situation. 

let readdata = new promise(function (resolve, reject) {      fs.readfile('/home/geek/desktop/activity-logs.csv', 'utf8', (err, data) => {          if (err)              reject();          resolve(data);        });    });    readdata      .then((data) => {          banklogs = splitstring(data, ';')      })      .then(() => {          (let index = 2; index < banklogs.length; index += 5) {              objectofusers[banklogs[index]] = {}              temporarysymbols.push(banklogs[index].concat(banklogs[index + 1]));          }          object.keys(objectofusers).foreach(function (element) {              objectkeys.push(element)          });          (let index = 0; index < objectkeys.length; index++)              createobject(index);          console.log(objectofusers)      })      .catch((err) => console.log('error happened : ' + err));

from code snippet implemented promise chain resolving 1 promise initializes , returns new one.

something like:

let readdata = new promise(/* ... */);  readdata.then((data) => {         let promise2 = new promise(/* ... */);         return promise2;     }).then(() => {         // ...     })     .catch((err) => console.log('error happened : ' + err));

however after resolving readdata wrote simple logic , there no new promises: banklogs = splitstring(data, ';')

so should be:

let readdata = new promise(function (resolve, reject) {     fs.readfile('/home/geek/desktop/activity-logs.csv', 'utf8', (err, data) => {         if (err)             reject();         resolve(data);         });     });  readdata.then((data) => {     var banklogs = splitstring(data, ';')      (let index = 2; index < banklogs.length; index += 5) {         objectofusers[banklogs[index]] = {}         temporarysymbols.push(banklogs[index].concat(banklogs[index + 1]));     }     object.keys(objectofusers).foreach(function (element) {         objectkeys.push(element)     });     (let index = 0; index < objectkeys.length; index++)         createobject(index);     console.log(objectofusers) }) .catch((err) => console.log('error happened : ' + err));

if use banklogs inside promise only, make private.

promise chain approach use code readability , handling 1 error callback promises.

edit

you can pass value through promise chain using wrapper object or list of items (example):

'use strict';  var fs = require('fs');  let readdata = new promise(function (resolve, reject) {     fs.readfile('/users/maxim/appsflyer/projects/zevel/file1.txt', 'utf8', (err, data) => {         if (err)             reject();          var obj = {             data: data,             banklogs: {} // in 1st promise initialize banklogs         };             resolve(obj);         });     });  // 2nd dummy promise  let newreaddata = new promise(function (resolve, reject) {     fs.readfile('/users/maxim/appsflyer/projects/zevel/file2.txt', 'utf8', (err, data) => {         if (err)             reject();         resolve(data);      });  });  readdata.then((obj1) => {         obj1.banklogs.value = "somevalue";      return newreaddata.then(function(data2){                obj1.data2 = data2;         return obj1;     }); }).then((datatotal) => {        console.log(datatotal);  }) .catch((err) => console.log('error happened : ' + err));

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more