javascript - Setting an Instance to null -


so i've read through javascript memory management , few other articles, understand there garbage collecting daemon runs on interval , auto-magically cleans up.

the problem have if set object instance null , run timeout check null after setting null instance still exists.

here problem using simple example:

class animal{  	constructor(name){  		this.name = name;	  	}  }  class cat extends animal{  	constructor(name,type){  		super(name);  		this.type = type;  	}	  	renderhtml(){  		console.log(`rendering html...`);  		//variable exists while block executing...  		let divelement = document.createelement('div');  		//this should reference....  		divelement.addeventlistener('click',this.testinstancelife.bind(this));  		divelement.innerhtml = this.name;  		document.body.appendchild(divelement);  		//remove dom interface....  		document.body.removechild(divelement);  		console.log(`there should 0 references instance, since divelement should removed after block execution..`);  	}  	testinstancelife(){  		console.log(this);  	}  }  //init  (()=>{  	document.addeventlistener('domcontentloaded',()=>{  		var cat = new cat('grumpy','tabby');  		cat.renderhtml();  		cat = null;  		console.log(`this object now: ${cat}`);  		console.log(`finished executing...`);  	});  })();

question: why async timeout , or instance method still have reference though set null before both executed?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more