Asp.Net core 2.0: Detect Startup class invoked from migration or other ef operation -


at current moment default startup.cs flow executed on every db related operation droping db, adding migration, updating db migrations, etc.

i have heavy app specific code in startup need invoked if application run real. how detect startup class run migration or other database related dotnet command.

well, noticed in comment question there idesigntimedbcontextfactory interface need implemented resolve dbcontext @ design time.

it this:

public static class programm{     ...     public static iwebhost buildwebhostduringgen(string[] args)     {             return webhost.createdefaultbuilder(args)                 .usestartup<startupgen>()  // <--- i'm using different startup child there less complex code                 .usedefaultserviceprovider(options => options.validatescopes = false).build();     } }  public class dbcontextfactory : idesigntimedbcontextfactory<mydbcontext>     {            public mydbcontex createdbcontext(string[] args)         {             return program.buildwebhostduringgen(args).services.getrequiredservice<mydbcontext>();         }     }

however, due unclear reasons (i asked guys microsoft, don't explain me) dotnet on every operation implicitly call programm.buildwebhost if it's private - that's reason why standard flow executed each time question's author. workaround - rename programm.buildwebhost else, initwebhost

there issue created that, maybe resolved in 2.1 release on in future.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more