How to have vim highlight color change for the pattern under cursor? -


is there way have search highlight text in vim under cursor have different color compared search text not under cursor?

my .vimrc has codes:

function! hiinterestingword(n) " {{{2     " save our location.     normal! mz     " yank current word z register.     normal! "zyiw     " calculate arbitrary match id.  nothing else using it.     let mid = 77750 + a:n     " clear existing matches, don't worry if don't exist.     "silent! call matchdelete(mid)     try         call matchdelete(mid)     catch 'e803'         " construct literal pattern has match @ boundaries.         let pat = '\v\<' . escape(@z, '\') . '\>'         " match words.         call matchadd("interestingword" . a:n, pat, 1, mid)     endtry     " move our original location.     normal! `z endfunction   "clear highlighting function! clearallhi()     in range(1,6)         let mid = 77750 +         silent! call matchdelete(mid)     endfor endfunction  nnoremap <silent> <leader>0 :call clearallhi()<cr> nnoremap <silent> <leader>1 :call hiinterestingword(1)<cr> nnoremap <silent> <leader>2 :call hiinterestingword(2)<cr> nnoremap <silent> <leader>3 :call hiinterestingword(3)<cr> nnoremap <silent> <leader>4 :call hiinterestingword(4)<cr> nnoremap <silent> <leader>5 :call hiinterestingword(5)<cr> nnoremap <silent> <leader>6 :call hiinterestingword(6)<cr>  hi def interestingword1 guifg=#000000 ctermfg=16 guibg=#ffa724 ctermbg=214 hi def interestingword2 guifg=#000000 ctermfg=16 guibg=#aeee00 ctermbg=154 hi def interestingword3 guifg=#000000 ctermfg=16 guibg=#8cffba ctermbg=121 hi def interestingword4 guifg=#000000 ctermfg=16 guibg=#b88853 ctermbg=137 hi def interestingword5 guifg=#000000 ctermfg=16 guibg=#ff9eb8 ctermbg=211 hi def interestingword6 guifg=#000000 ctermfg=16 guibg=#ff2c4b ctermbg=195 "}}}

this allows press <leader> + 1-6 high light word under cursor in different colors; pressing twice clear highlighting. (you can change color in hi def...) commands. , <leader>+0 clear highlights.

you can put codes in vimrc try.

it works this:

enter image description here


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more