javascript - Need a more efficient way to clear unresourceful setInterval() id's -


i in situation had create clear array of setinterval() methods:

let intervals = []  for(let i=0; i<10; i++){   intervals.push( setinterval( function(){}, 1000 ) ) }  for(let i=0; i<10; i++){   clearinterval( intervals[i] ) }

but whatever reason didn't work. came across this:

for (let i=1; i<9999; i++){   window.clearinterval(i) }

which worked perfectly, why should have use performance threatening hack clear bunch of intervals? noticed when logging interval id's this:

function makeintervals(){    let intervals = []    for(let i=0; i<10; i++){     intervals.push( setinterval( function(){}, 1000 ) )   }    console.log( 'interval id\'s: ' + intervals )    for(let i=0; i<10; i++){     clearinterval( intervals[i] )   }  }  makeintervals() // interval id's: 5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14 makeintervals() // interval id's: 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24 makeintervals() // interval id's: 25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34

you can see though old intervals cleared, new interval id's still being incremented , assigned each new setinterval().

is there reason creating new, incremented interval id's though previous id's cleared?

why not throw old id's pool instead of looping 9999+ times, have loop 10 times?

need more efficient way clear unresourceful setinterval() id's !

cheers.

edit: reason being such stickler because i'm using recursive function create new setinterval()'s , clear old ones. sooner or later 9999+ loops of clearinterval() wouldn't enough.

i think getting confused in thinking clearintervals(interval[i]) removing element i intervals array, not doing. once clear interval, there no reason store reference it, should remove array using array.splice:

for (let = 0; < 10; i++){     clearinterval(intervals[i]);     intervals.splice(i, 1); // remove element array }

now, when call function again, previous elements no longer exist in array start on @ 0.

also, instead of assuming array length 10, if want loop entire array should use array.length:

for (let = 0; < intervals.length; i++){     clearinterval(intervals[i]);     intervals.splice(i, 1); }

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more