C++ Create Object Array without default constructor -


i error when dynamically creating array of (transaction) object. error output says:"no matching function call 'transaction::transaction()' part of assignment , not allowed use default constructor. gather array automatically assigns values each of indexed address when it's created , no default constructor made transaction, cannot without values. please me see fix error.

class transaction { private:   int id;   float amount;   string fromaddress, toaddress, signature;   bool confirmed, removefrompool;   static int numtransactions;   public:   transaction(string in_fa, string in_ta,string in_sign,float in_amount);   transaction(transaction &obj);   int getid() const; } //---------------------  class block { private:   int id, txcount;   const int max_tx=5;   transaction** txlist;   string blockhash, prevblockhash, minername;   bool confirmed;  public:   block(int id,string prevh,string name);   } //------------------ // block.cpp block::block(int i, string prevh, string name) { *txlist = new transaction[max_tx]; }

if insist on using plain dynamic array, could this:

*txlist = new transaction[max_tx]{{"1", "2", "3", 4},                                   // 3 more                                   {"5", "6", "7", 8}};

but instead declare constructor as:

transaction(string in_fa = "a", string in_ta = "b", string in_sign = "c", float in_amount = 42);

and attempt dodge silly 'no default ctor' requirement.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more