c# - Should I use a using statement/dispose if the object isn't actually going to be used in code? -


this question has answer here:

i'm working in winforms code right now, , have come across lines several times:

... system.diagnostics.process.start(somefilename); ...

...which kicks off process on client machine, , forgets it. process.start(somefilename) returns process type object, implements idisposable, code not doing object, because whole idea trigger process , forget it.

in case, should process object still disposed, if we're not keeping in memory @ all? like:

using (system.diagnostics.process.start(somefilename) { }

or 

var process = system.diagnostics.process.start(somefilename); process.dispose();

process objects holds unmanaged resource(s) (hprocess handle)

https://referencesource.microsoft.com/#system/services/monitoring/system/diagnosticts/process.cs,f8b2e604d6f1fe04

public class process : component {     //     // fields     //      bool haveprocessid;     int processid;     bool haveprocesshandle;     safeprocesshandle m_processhandle; // <- should disposed     bool isremotemachine;     string machinename;     processinfo processinfo;     int32 m_processaccess; ...

and should disposed. using local variable (var process = ...) looks overshooting in context, that's why suggest

system.diagnostics.process.start(somefilename).close();

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more