elasticsearch aggregations by user defined group -


let's have these data in es.

| key        | value       | |:-----------|------------:| |          |            1| |          |            2| | b          |            2|  | c          |            3|    | d          |            4|  | e          |            5|   | e          |            5|   | f          |            6|

i use 

{   "from": 0,   "size": 0,   "query": {     "filtered" : {       "query" : {           "match_all" : {}        },       "filter" : {         "bool" : {           "must" : [             {"terms": {"key": ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f"]}}           ]         }       }     }   },   "aggs" : {     "sum_value" : {       "terms" : { "field" : "key" },       "aggs" : {         "sum_value" : { "sum" : { "field" : "value" } }       }     }   } }

to sum of same key, results this:

"sum_uv": {   "doc_count_error_upper_bound": 0,   "sum_other_doc_count": 0,   "buckets": [     {       "key": "a",       "doc_count": 2,       "sum_value": {         "value": 3       }     }     ....   ] }

but now, want sum elements in same group, example, have mapping data, tells me group information:

group1 = [a, b, c] group2 = [d, e, f] .....

i think need nested aggregation purpose, have no idea this.

the result this:

sum_group1 = 8 sum_group2 = 20 ......

thanks in advance!

there @ least 2 ways of doing this:

  1. if groups fixed, can add group name each document , aggregate first on group, on values.
  2. if want more dynamic approach, can use filter + regexp group results. see example here: https://www.elastic.co/blog/quick-tips-regex-filter-buckets

two examples using filters:

1

{   "size": 0,   "aggs": {     "groups": {       "filters": {         "filters": {           "group1": { "terms": { "key": [ "a","b","c" ] } },           "group2": { "terms": { "key": [ "d","e","f" ] } }         }       },       "aggs": {         "groupsum": {           "sum": {             "field": "key"           }         }       }     }   } }

2

{   "size": 0,   "query": {     "match_all": { }   },   "aggs": {     "group1": {       "filter": {         "terms": {           "key": [ "a", "b", "c" ]         }       },       "aggs": {         "group1sum": {           "sum": {             "field": "value"           }         }       }     },     "group2": {       "filter": {         "terms": {           "key": [ "d", "e", "f" ]         }       },       "aggs": {         "group2sum": {           "sum": {             "field": "value"           }         }       }     }   } }

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more