android - Leak on ViewHolder and Recycler view with MVVM -


i'm having issue viewholder leaking reference context via simple toast

this adapter (dummy data)

public class changelanguageadapter extends recyclerview.adapter<languageviewholder> { @override public languageviewholder oncreateviewholder(viewgroup parent, int viewtype) {     layoutinflater layoutinflater =             layoutinflater.from(parent.getcontext());      itemlanguagebinding itembinding =             itemlanguagebinding.inflate(layoutinflater, parent, false);      return new languageviewholder(itembinding); }  @override public void onbindviewholder(languageviewholder holder, int position) {     string language = "dummy language";     holder.setlanguage(language);     holder.bind(language); }  @override public int getitemcount() {     return 20; } }

this viewholder

public class languageviewholder extends recyclerview.viewholder {  private itemlanguagebinding binding;  private string language;  public languageviewholder(itemlanguagebinding itemlanguagebinding) {     super(itemlanguagebinding.getroot());     this.binding = itemlanguagebinding; }  public void bind(string a){     setlanguage(a);     binding.setviewmodel(this);     binding.executependingbindings(); }  public string getlanguage() {     return language; }  public void setlanguage(string language) {     this.language = language; }  public void onclick(view v){     toast.maketext(v.getcontext(), language, toast.length_long).show(); }  }

and how binding done:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 

<data>     <variable         name="viewmodel"         type=".adapters.languageviewholder" /> </data>  <textview     android:layout_width="wrap_content"     android:layout_height="wrap_content"     android:text="@{viewmodel.language}"     android:textcolor="@color/colorblack"     android:onclick="@{viewmodel::onclick}"     tools:text="language" />

should nullify binding when ondestroy executed? don't understand why viewmodel being leaked


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more