node.js - Disable automatic population of models in sails v1.0 -


i using sailsjs v1.0.0-36. want disable model population.

so when send request http://my-app/pets:

[   {     id: 1,     breed: 'wolves',     type: 'direwolf',     name: 'ghost',     owner: 1, //user id   },    {     id: 2,     breed: 'wolves',     type: 'direwolf',     name: 'summer',     owner: 1, //user id   }, ]

and when send request http://my-app/users:

[   {      id: 1      firstname: 'john',      lastname: 'snow',      pets: [ //array of pets id        1,        2,      ]   } ]

where user model defined as

// myapp/api/models/user.js  // user may have many pets  module.exports = {    attributes: {      firstname: {        type: 'string'      },      lastname: {        type: 'string'      },        // add reference pets      pets: {        collection: 'pet',        via: 'owner'      }    }  };

and pet model defined as

// myapp/api/models/pet.js  // pet may belong single user  module.exports = {    attributes: {      breed: {        type: 'string'      },      type: {        type: 'string'      },      name: {        type: 'string'      },        // add reference user      owner: {        model: 'user'      }    }  };

in sails v0.12.0 can in /config/blueprints.js setting

populate = false

but deprecated in sails v1.0, following this docs can achieve overriding parseblueprintoptions, , this default implementation of function.

how can override achieve required results?

according commit sailjs 1.0 started support option again.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more