data structures - Can we assign address of two nodes as a next of a one LinkedListNode in C#? -


i solving 1 program linked list data structure in c#, need check given linked list null terminated or ends cycle. want check different test cases, not able pass cyclic linked list input.

how pass cyclic linked list input?

problem hackerrank give idea, trying achieve?

here code achieve linked list showed in image

private static linkedlist<int> initializelinkedlist ()         {         linkedlist<int> linkedlist = new linkedlist<int>();          linkedlistnode<int> item1 = new linkedlistnode<int>(1);         linkedlistnode<int> item2 = new linkedlistnode<int>(2);         linkedlistnode<int> item3 = new linkedlistnode<int>(3);         linkedlistnode<int> item4 = new linkedlistnode<int>(4);         linkedlistnode<int> item5 = new linkedlistnode<int>(5);         linkedlistnode<int> item6 = new linkedlistnode<int>(6);         linkedlist.addlast(item1);         linkedlist.addlast(item2);         linkedlist.addlast(item3);         linkedlist.addlast(item4);         linkedlist.addlast(item5);         linkedlist.addafter(item3, item6);          return linkedlist;                     }

it's impossible create cycle, linkedlist<> built linkedlistnode<> these node contain item value list, next , previous used navigating, these members have internal setters can't manually assign these. these set when call addfirst, addlast, addafter or addbefore on linkedlist.

in theory set first , last same linkedlistnode

        var item1 = new linkedlistnode<string>("one");         var item2 = new linkedlistnode<string>("two");         var item3 = new linkedlistnode<string>("three");          var list = new linkedlist<string>();          list.addfirst(item1);         list.addafter(item1, item2);         list.addafter(item2, item3);         list.addlast(item1);

but if try following we'll "unhandled exception: system.invalidoperationexception: linkedlist node belongs linkedlist." exception


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more