java - Why the concept of starting and stopping beans in spring -


there different ways in bean initializaiton/cleanup can done. there other event mechanisms. along why spring have concept of starting context believe invokes respective start , stop methods of beans.

to test this, have piece of code looks -

public class car implements initializingbean, disposablebean, smartlifecycle {       private engine engine;       private volatile boolean isrunning = false;       @override     public void afterpropertiesset() throws exception {         logger.debug("car -- afterpropertiesset");     }      @override     public void destroy() throws exception {         logger.debug("car -- destroy");     }      @postconstruct     public void postconstruction() {         logger.debug("car -- postconstruct");     }      @predestroy     public void predestruction() {         logger.debug("car -- predestroy");     }       @override     public void stop() {         //note stop notification not guaranteed come before destruction: on regular shutdown,          //lifecycle beans first receive stop notification before general destruction callbacks being propagated;          //however, on hot refresh during context's lifetime or on aborted refresh attempts, destroy methods called.         logger.debug("car -- stop");         isrunning = false;     }      @override     public boolean isrunning() {         //check whether component running.         //in case of container, return true if components apply running.         logger.debug("car -- isrunning");         return isrunning;     }      @override     public int getphase() {         //return phase value of object.         logger.debug("car -- getphase");         return 10;     }      @override     public boolean isautostartup() {         //returns true if lifecycle component should started automatically container          //a value of false indicates component intended started through explicit start() call instead,          //analogous automatic lifecycle.         logger.debug("car -- isautostartup");         return false;     }      @override     public void stop(runnable callback) {         logger.debug("car -- stop -  async");         isrunning = false;          try {             //sleeping 10 seconds threads             //get enough time cleanup              timeunit.seconds.sleep(10);            logger.debug("wait over");            //shudown complete. regular shutdown continue.            callback.run();        } catch (final interruptedexception e) {            //looks got exception while shutting down,             //log or        }     }      @override     public void start() {         //start component.         //should not throw exception if component running.         logger.debug("car -- start");         isrunning = true;     } }

first return true value isautostartup try returning false. image below comparison of log files of 2 runs. difference of log files , irrespective of whether autostartup true/false, code runs fine.

this when beans related services. may want know when have started successfully, , have correct shutdown procedure/ cleanup/ teardown on routine application shutdown.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more