javascript - Ember.js: Component attribute not reset while testing -


i attempting acceptance test on nested route, makes use of same component twice, different arguments. works fine when run normally, run acceptance test, notice component's arguments aren't being updated, causes test fail. here sample code:

in index.hbs have:

{{index-view model=model type='location'}}

my index-view component looks this:

<h1>{{title}} list</h1>  {{listing-table model=model type=type}}

by clicking on element in listing-table, go locations.show route, contains link-to locations.show.devices route. locations.show.devices route contains:

{{listing-table model=model.devices type='device' exclude='locationname'}}

however, in acceptance tests, can see (by echoing out these attributes in component's javascript) while model , type being updated, exclude set whatever set when component called.

now, have checked (via console.log()) whether component being reused or not, , see both init () , diddestroyelement () called twice, means component goes through entire lifecycle twice. however, can't understand why exclude argument not being updated @ all, , why happen while acceptance testing?

this stripped down version of i'm doing (of course works on twiddle, not in real life!).

{{listing-table model=model.devices type='device' exclude='locationname'}}

you pass value "locationname" ( string ) not link property .locationname of component . ( i'm quotes around locationname )

you know, yes?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more