python - How to stack channels in Tensorflow input pipeline? -


i started working tf few weeks ago , struggling input queue right now. want following: have folder 477 temporal, greyscale images. want e.g. take first 3 images , stack them (=> 600,600,3), single example 3 channels. next want take fourth image , use label (just 1 channel => 600,600,1). want pass both tf.train.batch , create batches.

i think found solution, see code below. wondering if there more fashionable solution.

my actual question is: happens @ end of queue. since i'm picking 4 images queue (3 input, 1 label) , have 477 images in queue, things not working out. tf fill queue again , continues (so if there 1 image left in queue, takes image, fills queue again , take 2 more images desired 3 images?). or need number of images divisible 4 in folder if want proper solution?

def read_image(filename_queue):   reader = tf.wholefilereader()   _, value = reader.read(filename_queue)   image = tf.image.decode_png(value, dtype=tf.uint8)   image = tf.cast(image, tf.float32)   image = tf.image.resize_images(image, [600, 600])   return image  def input_pipeline(file_names, batch_size, num_epochs=none):    filename_queue = tf.train.string_input_producer(file_names, num_epochs=num_epochs, shuffle=false)   image1 = read_image(filename_queue)   image2 = read_image(filename_queue)   image3 = read_image(filename_queue)   image = tf.concat([image1, image2, image3,], axis=2)   label = read.image(filename_queue)    # reshape necessary, otherwise error..   image = tf.reshape(image, [600, 600, 3])   label = tf.reshape(label, [600, 600, 1])    min_after_dequeue = 200   capacity = min_after_dequeue + 12 * batch_size   image_batch, label_batch = tf.train.batch([image, label],                              batch_size=batch_size,                              num_threads=12,                              capacity=capacity)   return image_batch, label_batch

thanks help!

but wondering if there more fashionable solution

yes! there's better , faster solution. first redesign database, since want combine 3 gray images 1 rgb images training; prepare dataset of rgb images gray images (it save whole lot of time during training).

redesign way retrieve data

  # retrieve image , corresponding label @ same time    # here if set num_epochs=none, queue run continuously; , take-care of data need training till end   filename_queue = tf.train.string_input_producer([file_names_images_list, corresponding_file_names_label_list], num_epochs=none, shuffle=false)    image = read_image(filename_queue[0])   label = read_image(filename_queue[1])

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more