scikit learn - sklearn not following n_iter param: Giving more iterations than asked -


the following doubt had while now. if resonates you, hope helps.

i have following simple code

with_model_analysis = perceptron(n_iter=2, warm_start=true, verbose=1)

when following code run

with_model_analysis.fit(x_train, y_train)

i verbose output follows:

-- epoch 1 norm: 2117.10, nnzs: 151491, bias: -0.200000, t: 2438128, avg. loss: 0.136197 total training time: 1.57 seconds. -- epoch 2 norm: 2152.62, nnzs: 152310, bias: -0.210000, t: 4876256, avg. loss: 0.138114 total training time: 3.14 seconds. -- epoch 1 norm: 2864.00, nnzs: 144626, bias: -0.250000, t: 2438128, avg. loss: 0.140278 total training time: 1.57 seconds. -- epoch 2 norm: 2908.83, nnzs: 145051, bias: -0.240000, t: 4876256, avg. loss: 0.141844 total training time: 3.13 seconds. -- epoch 1 norm: 996.64, nnzs: 55420, bias: -0.160000, t: 2438128, avg. loss: 0.012540 total training time: 1.59 seconds. -- epoch 2 norm: 1013.77, nnzs: 56011, bias: -0.150000, t: 4876256, avg. loss: 0.012728 total training time: 3.18 seconds. -- epoch 1 norm: 2850.54, nnzs: 176581, bias: -0.270000, t: 2438128, avg. loss: 0.209191 total training time: 1.58 seconds. -- epoch 2 norm: 2895.90, nnzs: 177293, bias: -0.260000, t: 4876256, avg. loss: 0.211221 total training time: 3.18 seconds. -- epoch 1 norm: 1489.41, nnzs: 80787, bias: -0.270000, t: 2438128, avg. loss: 0.029082 total training time: 1.54 seconds. -- epoch 2 norm: 1516.51, nnzs: 81432, bias: -0.290000, t: 4876256, avg. loss: 0.029050 total training time: 3.06 seconds. -- epoch 1 norm: 2718.56, nnzs: 191107, bias: 0.190000, t: 2438128, avg. loss: 0.178792 total training time: 1.48 seconds. -- epoch 2 norm: 2762.41, nnzs: 191638, bias: 0.220000, t: 4876256, avg. loss: 0.181443 total training time: 2.99 seconds. [parallel(n_jobs=1)]: done   6 out of   6 | elapsed:   28.5s finished

what last line done 6 out of 6 mean? when required iterations 2, why doing 6 * 2 iterations?

the 6 represents number of output classes. in multi-class classifications, trains one-versus-all decision boundaries, trains classes separately.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more