Kill chromedriver process in Selenium / Java -


i running multiple java programs through jenkins using "build periodically" option , uses h 06 * * 1-5 (run every day between 6 , 7 monday friday).

there programs in click on links opens new window. hence, use below code 

driver.findelement(by.xpath(".//*[@id='terms']/li[1]/a")).click(); system.out.println("home page loaded , terms of use link clicked"); arraylist<string> window1 = new arraylist<string>(driver.getwindowhandles()); driver.switchto().window(window1.get(1)); thread.sleep(3000); driver.close(); thread.sleep(3000); driver.switchto().window(window1.get(0));

now after program runs, other program following fails because of chromedriver.exe process running.

i tried using driver.quit() instead of driver.close() in code above, close entire browser.

note: have used driver.quit() @ end of program doesn't me getting rid of running chromedriver.exe instance opened when switched window.

please suggest me a way handle issue. have been looking solution in java. see answers c#.

thanks

the root cause in other place. such issues happen in case of unexpected exceptions thrown, prevent framework quitting session cleanly.

as can't see entire picture of how you're managing webdriver sessions, it'll guessing game.

driver killed via command line, e.g. taskkill (or whatever os you're using), executed via e.g. https://github.com/zeroturnaround/zt-exec library. it'd workaround, hide potential weakness of architecture.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more