vert.x - Vertx merge contents of multiple files in single file -


what best way append contents of multiple files single file in vertx? have tried vertx filesystem , asyncfile both not have option append file or did not know of any. there alternative approach merge or append files in vertx asynchronously.

the solution find make buffer list , write content on end of each previous buffer length using loop.

indeed, of vert.x 3.4, there no helper method on filesystem append file file.

you asyncfile , pump follows.

first create utility method open files:

future<asyncfile> openfile(filesystem filesystem, string path, openoptions openoptions) {   future<asyncfile> future = future.future();   filesystem.open(path, openoptions, future);   return future; }

then 1 append file file pump:

future<asyncfile> append(asyncfile source, asyncfile destination) {   future<asyncfile> future = future.future();   pump pump = pump.pump(source, destination);   source.exceptionhandler(future::fail);   destination.exceptionhandler(future::fail);   source.endhandler(v -> future.complete(destination));   pump.start();   return future; }

now can combine sequential composition:

void merge(filesystem filesystem, string output, list<string> sources) {   openfile(filesystem, output, new openoptions().setcreate(true).settruncateexisting(true).setwrite(true)).compose(outfile -> {     future<asyncfile> mergefuture = null;     (string source : sources) {       if (mergefuture == null) {         mergefuture = openfile(filesystem, source, new openoptions()).compose(sourcefile -> {           return append(sourcefile, outfile);         });       } else {         mergefuture = mergefuture.compose(v -> {           return openfile(filesystem, source, new openoptions()).compose(sourcefile -> {             return append(sourcefile, outfile);           });         });       }     }     return mergefuture;   }).sethandler(ar -> {     system.out.println("done");   }); }

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more