performance - MySQL updates getting very slow towards end of the table -


i have table "data" holds around 100,000,000 records. have added new column "batch_id" (integer).

on application layer, i'm updating batch_id in batches of 10,000 records each of 100,000,000 records (the batch_id same 10k).

i'm doing (application layer pseudo code):

loop {   $batch_id = $batch_id + 1;   mysql.query("update data set batch_id='$batch_id' batch_id null limit 10000"); }

i have index on batch_id column.

in beginning, update statement took ~30 seconds. i'm halfway through table , it's getting slower , slower. @ moment same statement takes around 10 minutes(!). reached point no longer feasible take on month update whole table @ current speed.

what speed up, , why mysql getting slower towards end of table? index on primary key help?

is primary key automatically indexed in mysql? answer yes

so instead 1 index batch_id help.

the problem without index engine full table scan. @ first easy find 10k null values, when more , more records updated engine have scan more find nulls.

but should easier create batch_id autonumeric column

other option: create new table , add index , replace old table.

create newtable      select if(@newid := @newid + 1,               @newid div 10000,               @newid div 10000) batch_id,            <other fields>     yourtable              cross join (select @newid :=0 ) v

insert auto increment primary key existing table


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more