css - link background not changing according to what i want -


here code example

the .navbar has 0.5 transparency , not want background of links changed when hovering. (right background white)

if use navbar-default class can change background of list items , links not able transparency thing. , if dont use navbar-default/inverse able navbar transparent links have background property on hover, not able override.

html

<nav role="navigation" class="navbar navbar-fixed-top">   <div class="container-fluid">     <div class="navbar-header">       <a href="#" class="navbar-brand"><img class="logo" src="images/brand.png"></a>       <button type="button" class="navbar-toggle" data-target="#navbarcollapse" data-toggle="collapse"><span class="sr-only">toggle</span>         <span class="icon-bar"></span>         <span class="icon-bar"></span>         <span class="icon-bar"></span></button>     </div>     <div class="navbar-collapse collapse" id="navbarcollapse">       <ul class="nav navbar-nav">         <li class=""><a href="#">home</a></li>         <li><a href="#">about</a></li>         <li><a href="#">portfolio</a></li>         <li><a href="#">contact</a></li>       </ul>     </div>   </div> </nav>

css

 .navbar {    background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5);    font-family: avro;  }   .nav li a:hover {    background: none;  }

sadly need override boostrap style !important. besides not recommend use background:none; need override background-color property recommend add css:

.nav > li > a:hover {   background-color: transparent !important;   /* smooth override important */ }

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more