akka - Scala Slick - Omit ID column (Auto_Increment) -


i have learned scala, slick, akka 2 months , got problem when doing project of akka...

// case class use parsing data request // case class usertransaction(sender: string, recipient: string, amount: int)  //this 1 use reflecting database case class usertransactiondb(sender: string, recipient: string, amount: int, id: int)  class usertransactionmodeldb(tag: tag) extends table[usertransactiondb](tag, "usertransaction") {     def id = column[int]("id", o.primarykey, o.autoinc)     def sender = column[string]("sender")     def recipient = column[string]("recipient")      def amount = column[int]("amount")      override def * =          (sender, recipient, amount, id) <> (usertransactiondb.tupled, usertransactiondb.unapply)  }

i want send post request (json) akka :

{"sender" : "s" , "recipient" : "r", "amount" : 100}

now, want use 1 case class usertransaction (without "id" field in usertransactiondb) not reflect database , parse data request. possible ?

thank , sorry english !

try custom format... along these lines:

case class usertransactiondb(sender: string, recipient: string, amount: int, id: int)  object myjsonprotocol extends defaultjsonprotocol {   implicit object usertransactionjsonformat extends rootjsonformat[usertransactiondb] {     def write(c: usertransactiondb) =       jsarray(jsstring(c.sender), jsstring(c.recipient), jsnumber(c.amount))      def read(value: jsvalue) = value match {       case jsarray(vector(jsstring(sender), jsstring(recipient), jsnumber(amount))) =>         new usertransactiondb(sender, recipient, amount.toint)       case _ => deserializationerror("usertransactiondb expected")     }   } }

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more