php - Display custom attributes before WooCommerce upsells ( linked products) -


i manage display custom attributes shown after linked products how can make them appear before?

on left: have, right desired result

thanks enter image description here

if woocommerce template content-single-product.php see that:

/**  * woocommerce_after_single_product_summary hook.  *  * @hooked woocommerce_output_product_data_tabs - 10  * @hooked woocommerce_upsell_display - 15  * @hooked woocommerce_output_related_products - 20  */ do_action( 'woocommerce_after_single_product_summary' );

that means in woocommerce_after_single_product_summary hook, following displayed:

  1. first (with priority of 10) product tabs,
  2. then (with priority of 15) upsells,
  3. and finish (with priority of 20) related products.

so if want display custom code between product tabs , upsells, need use custom function hooked in woocommerce_after_single_product_summary action hook priority between 11 14.

you can way:

add_action('woocommerce_after_single_product_summary', 'custom_code_after_single_product_summary', 12 ); function custom_code_after_single_product_summary() {     global $product;      // set here post "meta_key" custom product attribute     $meta_key1 = 'pa_when-to-use';      // code (related comment):     echo get_post_meta($product->get_id(),  $meta_key1, true); }

code goes in function.php file of active child theme (or theme) or in plugin file.

tested , works on woocommerce 3+…


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more