elasticsearch - How to give tokens from certain tokenizers more weight? -


i have following (simplified) data

[   { id: 1, customernumber: "0008", name: "bob" },   { id: 2, customernumber: "0854", name: "sue" },   { id: 3, customernumber: "0041", name: "larry" } ]

the context auto-complete search bar @ top of application.

i'm using custom regex tokenizer trim leading zeros user need not enter them. gets me tokens

id 1 => "8" id 2 => "854" id 3 => "41"

i have edge-n-gram tokenizer applied gives me tokens

id 1 => "8" id 2 => "854", "85", "8" id 3 => "41", "4"

our users consider "0008" better match query "8" "0854". when search "8" getting tons of results "08**" ranking higher "0008".

how make "0008" rank higher "0854" when searching "8"?

  • sometimes users include leading zeros in query.
  • i think problem both id 1 , 2 tokenize single "8" there on equal. don't know how remedy problem.

query:

post _search {     "size": 24,     "from": 0,     "query": {          "multi_match": {             "query": "8",             "fields": [                 "customernumber",                 "name"             ],             "type": "best_fields"         }      } }

i ended achieving desired result changing "leading zeros trimmer" "token filter" "character filter".

i changed "edge n gram token filter" using "edge n gram tokenizer" instead.

these 2 changes gave me desired result.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more