javascript - What's the right way of defining event handler in ReactJS Component? -


there different ways of defining event handlers in reactjs component jsx syntax.

<input onchange={this.handlechange.bind(this)}></input>  // inline binding

and

<input onchange={() => this.handlechange()}></input>  // using arrow function

both allow handlechange function access this scope of component.

i have been using first syntax more clear in readability.

are there advantages or use cases use 1 on another?

from react docs

class loggingbutton extends react.component {   handleclick() {     console.log('this is:', this);   }    render() {     // syntax ensures `this` bound within handleclick     return (       <button onclick={(e) => this.handleclick(e)}>         click me       </button>     );   } }

the problem syntax different callback created each time loggingbutton renders. in cases, fine. however, if callback passed prop lower components, components might re-rendering. recommend binding in constructor or using property initializer syntax, avoid sort of performance problem.

so, should use bind , can in 2 ways.

from react docs

class toggle extends react.component {   constructor(props) {     super(props);     this.state = {istoggleon: true};      // binding necessary make `this` work in callback     this.handleclick = this.handleclick.bind(this);   }    handleclick() {     this.setstate(prevstate => ({       istoggleon: !prevstate.istoggleon     }));   }    render() {     return (       <button onclick={this.handleclick}>         {this.state.istoggleon ? 'on' : 'off'}       </button>     );   } }

and if bind annoys you, can this

class loggingbutton extends react.component {   // syntax ensures `this` bound within handleclick.   // warning: *experimental* syntax.   handleclick = () => {     console.log('this is:', this);   }    render() {     return (       <button onclick={this.handleclick}>         click me       </button>     );   } }

the advantage can think of using 1 on other in top approach can pass parameters handleclick function. can't think of situation on might that.

class toggle extends react.component {   constructor(props) {     super(props);     this.state = {istoggleon: true};   }    handleclick(e, something) {     this.setstate(prevstate => ({       istoggleon: !prevstate.istoggleon     }));     alert(something)   }    render() {     return (       <button onclick={(e) => this.handleclick(e, "yo!")}>         {this.state.istoggleon ? 'on' : 'off'}       </button>     );   } }  reactdom.render(   <toggle />,   document.getelementbyid('root') );

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more