Set “publish to web” in Google spreadsheet using Drive API (PHP) -


i trying use google drive api set google sheet "publish web" mode can embed on website.

using drive api in php:-

// api client , construct service object. $client = getclient(); $service = new google_service_sheets($client);  $driveservice = new google_service_drive($client); /* $copiedfile = new google_service_drive_drivefile(array('name' => 'project plan')); $responsebody=$driveservice->files->copy("1hajkeox4hhlk4aocvluuvftjbkphfklg1gg9-hsgh7u", $copiedfile); $sheet_id=$responsebody->id; */ $sheet_id="1tyktonmpaaxgas5ylnn8ntzpjtdesuyidhakhap8amk"; $revisions=$driveservice->revisions; $sheetinformation =$revisions->listrevisions("1tyktonmpaaxgas5ylnn8ntzpjtdesuyidhakhap8amk"); $revisions=$sheetinformation->getrevisions(); $count=count($revisions); $revision_id=$revisions[$count-1]->id; $finalrevision=$driveservice->revisions->get($sheet_id,$revision_id); $finalrevision->publishauto=true; $driveservice->revisions->update($sheet_id,$revision_id, $finalrevision);  die();

as far can tell conforms drive api specification (i wish hadn't removed code examples php!). however, getting following error returned in response body:- 

"error": {   "errors": [    {     "domain": "global",     "reason": "fieldnotwritable",     "message": "the resource body includes fields not directly writable."    }   ],   "code": 403,   "message": "the resource body includes fields not directly writable."  } }

any appreciated!


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more