c# - Implement extensibility on callback? -


currently, working on api, , developers can subscribe know updates.

so right implementing interface iresult , can send different parameters in callback result. problem right if in future, want add new callback, have add argument in method, , developers need change method call. there solution this?

public interface iresult {     int { get; set; } }  public class concreteresult : iresult {     public int     {         get;set;     } }   public class myapi {     public delegate void myapidelegate(iresult result);      public void startservice(myapidelegate callback, myapidelegate callback2)     {         //step 1         int = 0;         concreteresult result1 = new concreteresult();         result1.i = i;         callback(result1);         //step 2         += 1;         concreteresult result2 = new concreteresult();         result2.i = i;         callback2(result2);         //potentially added in future         //i += 1;         //callback3();     }      public void main()     {         //developers use api         startservice(developercallback, developercallback2);     }     private void developercallback(iresult result)     {         console.writeline(result.i);     }     private void developercallback2(iresult result)     {         console.writeline(result.i);     } }

oddly recommending events, nobody showing example. i'll bite.

judging naming conventions i'm guessing come java land. (c# methods pascalcase). c# has events, make things simpler. recommend study them up, they're quite common in c# code.

all have define public event on class, , have class invoke event necessary. (do ?. because unsubscribed event weirdly null).

then consuming class, subscribe handlers using +=.

this allows add new events in future without consumers having worry it.

public class myapi {     public event action<iresult> callback1;      public event action<iresult> callback2;      public void startservice()     {         //step 1         int = 0;         concreteresult result1 = new concreteresult();         result1.i = i;         callback1?.invoke(result1);         //step 2         += 1;         concreteresult result2 = new concreteresult();         result2.i = i;         callback2?.invoke(result2);         //potentially added in future         //i += 1;         //callback3();     } }  public static class program {      public static void main()     {         //developers use api         var api = new myapi();         api.callback1 += developercallback;         api.callback2 += developercallback2;          api.startservice();     }     private static void developercallback(iresult result)     {         console.writeline(result.i);     }     private static void developercallback2(iresult result)     {         console.writeline(result.i);     } }

also simple event handlers, can subscribe inline:

api.callback1 += result =>     {         console.writeline(result.i);     };

or simpler one-liners:

api.callback1 += result => console.writeline(result.i);

since asked, option bit more heavier simple events, more powerful reactive extensions. if want use these, can write code this:

using system.reactive.subjects;  public class myapi {     private readonly subject<iresult> callback1 = new subject<iresult>();      private readonly subject<iresult> callback2 = new subject<iresult>();      public void startservice()     {         //step 1         int = 0;         concreteresult result1 = new concreteresult();         result1.i = i;         callback1.onnext(result1);         //step 2         += 1;         concreteresult result2 = new concreteresult();         result2.i = i;         callback2.onnext(result2);     }      public iobservable<iresult> callback1 => this.callback1;      public iobservable<iresult> callback2 => this.callback2; }  public static class program {     public static void main()     {         var api = new myapi();          // subscribing returns disposable subscription, , disposing unsubscribes.         // means can use lambda syntax , still unsubscribe later         idisposable subscription =             api.callback1.subscribe(result => console.writeline(result.i));          api.startservice(); // writes result.          // once disposed, event no longer called         subscription.dispose();         api.startservice(); // doesn't write result.          // since idisposable special thing can scoped using blocks in c#, can following:         using (api.callback1.subscribe(result => console.writeline(result.i)))         {             api.startservice(); // writes result         }         api.startservice(); // doesn't write result      } }

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more