performance - How to know which count query is the fastest? -


i've been exploring query optimizations in recent releases of spark sql 2.3.0-snapshot , noticed different physical plans semantically-identical queries.

let's assume i've got count number of rows in following dataset:

val q = spark.range(1)

i count number of rows follows:

  1. q.count
  2. q.collect.size
  3. q.rdd.count
  4. q.queryexecution.tordd.count

my initial thought it's constant operation (surely due local dataset) somehow have been optimized spark sql , give result immediately, esp. 1st 1 spark sql in full control of query execution.

having had @ physical plans of queries led me believe effective query last:

q.queryexecution.tordd.count

the reasons being that:

  1. it avoids deserializing rows internalrow binary format
  2. the query codegened
  3. there's 1 job single stage

the physical plan simple that.

details job

is reasoning correct? if so, answer different if read dataset external data source (e.g. files, jdbc, kafka)?

the main question factors take consideration whether query more efficient others (per example)?

the other execution plans completeness.

q.count

q.count

q.collect.size

q.collect.size

q.rdd.count

q.rdd.count

i did testing on val q = spark.range(100000000):

  1. q.count: ~50 ms
  2. q.collect.size: stopped query after minute or so...
  3. q.rdd.count: ~1100 ms
  4. q.queryexecution.tordd.count: ~600 ms

some explanation:

option 1 far fastest because uses both partial aggregation , whole stage code generation. whole stage code generation allows jvm clever , drastic optimizations (see: https://databricks.com/blog/2017/02/16/processing-trillion-rows-per-second-single-machine-can-nested-loop-joins-fast.html).

option 2. slow , materializes on driver, bad idea.

option 3. option 4, first converts internal row regular row, , quite expensive.

option 4. fast without whole stage code generation.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more