JavaScript: find pairs from an object (not array) - collision detection -


i building game using javascript , need collision detection.

everything drawn in game has own id , stored in object. chose use object despite array container because easy delete children it. when example, bullet hits ship, removed object. array, of children have shifted when 1 object deleted. , nice have ids keep track of everything.

in order find pairs in array, can this:

var = []; //object container  for(var = 0; < a.lenght; i++){     for(var j = i+1; j < a.lenght; j++){         var object1 = a[i];         var object2 = a[j];         //collision detection     } }

but object

var o = {}; //object container  var progress = [];  for(var key1 in o){     progress.push(key1);     for(var key2 in o){         if(progress.indexof(key2) === -1){             var object1 = a[i];             var object2 = a[j];             //collision detection         }     } } progress = [];

this lot uglier array. there better way?

you use object.keys property names in object. it's array version:

var keys = object.keys(o);        // *** keys (var = 0; < keys.length; i++) {     (var j = + 1; j < keys.length; j++) {         var object1 = o[keys[i]]; // *** main change on         var object2 = o[keys[j]]; // *** these 2 lines         //collision detection     } }

note object.keys lists enumerable, own properties. for-in loop visit enumerable properties, inherited ones. i'm guessing o doesn't have enumerable inherited properties.

you need object.keys when add or remove ship, not every time need collision detection.

you'll need profile determine whether using object , rebuilding keys array when change more or less efficient using array , splice.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more