C++ loop hangs if any code is added inside if Condition -


i have following code strange behaviour:

struct mime {     int key;     string value; };  class storage {  private:      int size;     mime * _storage;     int last = 0;  public:      storage(int __size) {         size = __size;         _storage = new mime[size + 2];     }      void add(const mime & __mime) {          (int x = 0; x < last; x++)             if (_storage[x].key == __mime.key) {}          _storage[last++] = __mime;     } };  void test2() {      int thissize = 1000000;     storage storage(thissize);     auto start_t = chrono::high_resolution_clock::now();     (int = 0; < thissize; i++) {         mime temp;         temp.key = i;         temp.value = "hey";         storage.add(temp);     }     cout << chrono::duration_cast<chrono::milliseconds>(chrono::high_resolution_clock::now() - start_t).count() << " milliseconds\n" << endl; }   int main() {      test2();      cout << "done" << endl;      return 0; }

this code run in 120 milliseconds me. when add code here inside {}

if (_storage[x].key == __mime.key) {}

like 

if (_storage[x].key == __mime.key) { return; }

or else... program runs in 10 mins or hangs adding return; or other code. when add return; or other code in if condition, program hangs. in (if) nothing happens in process because doesn't seem run return; or other code.

any suggestions?

there's nothing strange behavior. it's optimizer recognizes for loop safely not executed @ if has empty block inside.

the optimizer says:

for (int x = 0; x < last; x++)     if (_storage[x].key == __mime.key) {}

look has no side effects...which mean, bunch of lines if executed not change state of program, so, i'd better save time , not execute it.

try compile -o0 still long runtime.

in order double check cause, 1 can trick compiler , force keep code using volatile

so following code won't optimized away , not matter content of for

  (volatile int x = 0; x < last; x++){       //whatever    }

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more