powershell - Docker build for Matlab Compiler Runtime on Windows (non-interactive installation) -


i notice steps in docker build takes more time manually executing same command in container. provide context, process of installing matlab compiler runtime (mcr) follows:

  1. download mcr installer mathworks website
  2. unpack installation files
  3. run /bin/win64/setup.exe -mode silent -agreetolicense yes (non-interactive install)

i created following dockerfile set mcr on microsoft windowsservercore image including dotnet-framework.

# line 1: use dotnet-framework base image microsoft/dotnet-framework  # line 2: download mcr installer (self-extracting executable) , save zip file add https://www.mathworks.com/supportfiles/downloads/r2014b/deployment_files/r2014b/installers/win64/mcr_r2014b_win64_installer.exe c:\\mcr_r2014b_win64_installer.zip  # line 3: use powershell shell ["powershell", "-command", "$erroractionpreference = 'stop'; $progresspreference = 'silentlycontinue';"]  # line 4: unpack zip contents installation folder run expand-archive c:\\mcr_r2014b_win64_installer.zip -destinationpath c:\\mcr_installer  # line 5: run setup command non-interactive installation of mcr run start-process c:\mcr_installer\bin\win64\setup.exe -argumentlist '-mode silent', '-agreetolicense yes' -wait  # line 6: remove zip , installation folder after setup complete run remove-item -force -recurse c:\\mcr_installer, c:\\mcr_r2014b_win64_installer.zip

i build new image using command:

docker build -t analytics/dotnet-mcr --no-cache --force-rm .

the installation of mcr slow, when compared stopping @ line 4 , manually running mcr setup container based on ensuing image (using exact same powershell command)... reason why needs 3-4 minutes when performing same step via dockerfile based build?

note: best practices suggest using download utility versus using add, don't have constraints related image size since removing intermediate images deleting downloaded installer , unpacked installation folder. plus, seeing cleaner download progress bar of add command.

i appreciate improvements/optimizations may suggested.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more