emacs - slime-inspector-eval: how to get bindings in the inspector? -


long story: motivation

i have cl code breaks on sort or mapcar error number (let's say, 25) not list. tells me wrong data structure pass them. so, put (break) in code before place error occurs. looks this:

(sort  (progn   (break)   (mapcar (lambda (pair)             (list (car pair) (cdr pair)))           (hash-table-plist (state-removed state)))  #'<  :key #'car)

(to give bit more context, idea here transform hash table (state-removed state) list of pairs sorted key, error instead of hash-table-plist should use hash-table-alist)

once code hits (break) sends me debugger. @ stage step through code, decided inspect state. unfortunately, state obtained with-slots-macro object slot in object, , whole function generated sketch macro sketch library... long story short, (state-removed state) need go through layers of slot accesses in inspector.

tl;dr: actual question

and here problem: want call hash-table-plist either on object i'm inspecting or on slot of object. how can access either of them (just comparison, in smalltalk debugger have access self pseudo-variable stuff out)? there slime-inspector-eval, how pass things don't have explicit local bindings? documentation on slime-inspector-eval doesn't much.

ok, bit more googling answered question. hope of use others.

thanks this blogpost: object under inspection bound *. also, m-ret in inspector (slime-inspector-copy-down) stores object under point in * can used in repl.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more