ios - SiriKit INSendMessageIntent skip confirm delegate -


i've been working on sirikit while, , result of demo not satisfied boss. reading apple documents & did best search online, still can't find way skip confirm step in sendmessageintent!

this purpose:

after resolving user comments siri,

func resolvecontent(forsendmessage intent: insendmessageintent, completion: @escaping (instringresolutionresult) -> void) {     if let text = intent.content, !text.isempty {         if text == "login touch id" {             completion(instringresolutionresult.success(with: text))         } else if text == "change password"{             completion(instringresolutionresult.success(with: text))         }         completion(instringresolutionresult.disambiguation(with: ["login touch id", "change password"]))     } else {         completion(instringresolutionresult.disambiguation(with: ["login touch id", "change password"]))     } }

skip step "confirm",

func confirm(sendmessage intent: insendmessageintent, completion: @escaping (insendmessageintentresponse) -> void) {     // verify user authenticated , app ready send message.      let useractivity = nsuseractivity(activitytype: nsstringfromclass(insendmessageintent.self))     let response = insendmessageintentresponse(code: .success, useractivity: useractivity)      completion(response) }

and handle delegate directly,

func handle(sendmessage intent: insendmessageintent, completion: @escaping (insendmessageintentresponse) -> void) {     // implement application logic send message here.      let useractivity = nsuseractivity(activitytype: nsstringfromclass(insendmessageintent.self))     let response = insendmessageintentresponse(code: .success, useractivity: useractivity)      completion(response) }

hope there's can answer question me. lot!

the confirm function optional, don't need implement able conform insendmessageintenthandling protocol, handle(intent:completion:) required. shows can skip confirmation part.

you should delete confirm function , sirikit call handle function directly, without confirmation.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more