regex - Execute Ruby method on whole page in Middleman -


on middleman-built website, need execute specific ruby code on contents of pages (templates).

for example, if had following helper in config.rb:

def myexample(text)     text.gsub("dog","cat") end

and in test.html.haml:

= myexample("some text dog.")

my previewed , generated /test.html read:

some text cat.

however, using several different ways output text needs modified, notably through haml's :markdown filter, prefer not wrap in = myexample("text") helper.

i able run ruby code take contents of pages (preferably) or generated html output (if first option not possible) argument passed such helper.

ideally, code run in both development , build environments, if that's not possible, build enough.

is possible so?

ps. in specific case, use shorthand notation reference other pages , use regular expression , eval() in order replace them relative links data files.

actioncontroller::base has render_to_string method give normal html output rendering partial or page, in string format. allow grab rendered html , modify before rendering real inline template.

in controller:

rendered_html = render_to_string 'your_template_or_partial' # stuff rendered_html render inline: rendered_html.html_safe, layout: 'layouts/application'

the html_safe method makes sure rails knows it's safe render html. not want if user input being rendered , have not sanitized it!!!!

if don't want use layout when rendering, remove :layout argument.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more