rxjs concatMap sequence -


i'm confused. please help! don't understand why of second promise in example emitted @ end when use concatmap(), , shoud wrong. how can right sequence waiting promise result (when promise got, next promise should start). @ concatmapto() , scan() can't understand how can @ example. tryed concatall(), waiting promise start subscribing not end of previos promise result.

jsbin http://jsbin.com/napasekemu/1/edit?js,console

example, sorry size can't more 2 links

code jsbin.com/tusolipofu/edit?js,console if link don't work:

const mysubject = new rx.subject(); let counter = 1; const source = mysubject.concatmap(v => rx.observable.from(v())) const subscribe = source.subscribe(val => console.log(val), err =>  console.log(err), () => console.log('complete')); mysubject.next(()=> {    return new promise(resolve => {        [10000,11000,12000,13000,14000,15000].foreach(e =>             mysubject.next(()=> {            return new promise(resolve => settimeout(()=> resolve(`${e} inner             each!`), e/2));        }));        resolve(`1 world!`)    }); });   [10,20,30].foreach(e => {     mysubject.next(()=> {          return new promise(resolve => settimeout(()=> resolve(`${e}           world!`),           7000));     }); });  mysubject.next(()=> {   return new promise(resolve => settimeout(()=> resolve(`6 world!`),    10000)); });  mysubject.next(()=> {    return new promise(resolve => resolve(`5 world!`)); });  mysubject.next(()=> {    return new promise(resolve => settimeout(()=> resolve(`7 world!`),  7000)); });   mysubject.next(()=> {    return new promise(resolve => settimeout(()=> resolve(`8 world!`),   7000));  });


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more