Left-align headers in markdown table? -


using table example "markdown cheatsheet" on github, this:

| tables        |           | cool  | | ------------- |:-------------:| -----:| | col 3      | right-aligned | $1600 | | col 2      | centered      |   $12 | | zebra stripes | neat      |    $1 |

enter image description here

my question is, there way left-align header cells?

it depends on implementation using.

tables non-standard feature of markdown , each implementation supports them differently. example, "cheetsheet" pointed in question within markdown here project. project's readme includes following explanation:

to discover can done markdown in markdown here, check out markdown here cheatsheet , other wiki pages.

so "cheetsheet" specific implementation used markdown here.

github has documented there implementation of markdown extension of commonmark spec (commonmark markdown variant not support tables). according example 192, column headers receive same alignment column cells:

| abc | defghi | :-: | -----------: bar | baz  <table> <thead> <tr> <th align="center">abc</th> <th align="right">defghi</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> <tr> <td align="center">bar</td> <td align="right">baz</td> </tr></tbody></table>

so, need check specific implementation of markdown using , read implementation's documentation. however, personally, have never come across implementation allows define separate alignment headers cells. in experience, either headers match cells, or headers have no alignment assigned.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more