vue.js - Computed property based on child components -


is possible create computed property relies on child components data? seems trivial task can't figure out...

foo component

<template>     {{ foo }} </template>  <script> export default {      computed: {         foo() {             return math.random()         }     } } </script>

parent component

<template>     foo computed property sum: {{ sum }}     <foo v-for="n in 10"></foo> </template>  export default {      computed: {         sum() {             // return...?                     }     } } </script>

you can, it's pretty unusual approach things, it's not best choice whatever you're trying achieve.

instead, might keep data in parent , pass component prop. if use value prop name, can nice clean syntax v-model. (you have use foos[index] due fact you can't v-model alias, in case you're generating index anyway).

new vue({    el: '#app',    data: {      foos: []    },    computed: {      sum() {        return this.foos.reduce((a, b) => + b, 0);      }    },    components: {      foo: {        template: '<div>{{ value }} <button @click="reroll">change it</button></div>',        props: ['value'],        created() {          this.reroll();        },        methods: {          reroll() {            this.$emit('input', math.floor(math.random() * 10));          }        }      }    }  });
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/vue/2.4.2/vue.min.js"></script>  <div id="app">    foo computed property sum: {{ sum }}    <foo v-for="index in 10" v-model="foos[index]"></foo>  </div>


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more