python - How to convert version 3.x "yield from" to something compatible in version 2.7? -


this works fine python 3.5 .i understand yield not available in python 2.7. how can implement depth_first() function using python 2.7?

the following solution did not me: converting "yield from" statement python 2.7 code

class node:  def __init__(self, value):     self._value = value     self._children = []   def __repr__(self):     return 'node({!r})'.format(self._value)   def add_child(self, node):     self._children.append(node)   def __iter__(self):     return iter(self._children)   def depth_first(self):     yield self     c in self:         yield c.depth_first()  # example if __name__ == '__main__':     root = node(0)     child1 = node(1)     child2 = node(2)     root.add_child(child1)     root.add_child(child2)     child1.add_child(node(3))     child1.add_child(node(4))     child2.add_child(node(5))     ch in root.depth_first():         print(ch)

this expected output:

node(0), node(1), node(3), node(4), node(2), node(5)

convert yield from for-loop plain yield.

convert class node: class node(object): ensure new-style class.

the code works in python 2.7. 

class node(object):  def __init__(self, value):     self._value = value     self._children = []   def __repr__(self):     return 'node({!r})'.format(self._value)   def add_child(self, node):     self._children.append(node)   def __iter__(self):     return iter(self._children)   def depth_first(self):     yield self     c in self:         n in c.depth_first():             yield n  # example if __name__ == '__main__':     root = node(0)     child1 = node(1)     child2 = node(2)     root.add_child(child1)     root.add_child(child2)     child1.add_child(node(3))     child1.add_child(node(4))     child2.add_child(node(5))     ch in root.depth_first():         print(ch)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more