multithreading - VB.NET Event Handler as the producer of a multithreaded producer-consumer pattern -


the pattern below smells few reasons, purposes of question, let's focus on global variables , event handler:

dim objectqueue new blockingcollection(of object) dim objectqueuecancel new cancellationtokensource  sub main()     task.run(sub()                  if console.readkey.keychar() = "c" objectqueuecancel.cancel()              end sub)     dim t1 task = task.run(sub() nonblockingconsumer())     dim t2 task = task.run(sub() nonblockingproducer())     task.waitall(t1, t2)     objectqueuecancel.dispose()     console.writeline("press enter key exit.")     console.readline() end sub  private sub nonblockingproducer()     dim sourceobjects icollection(of object) = nothing 'sanitized stackoverflow     each sourceobject in sourceobjects         if sourceobject.isenabled             dim objecteventgenerator new objecteventgenerator(sourceobject)             addhandler objecteventgenerator.objectevent, addressof handler_objectevent             objecteventgenerator.enabled = true         end if         if objectqueue.isaddingcompleted exit     next sourceobject end sub  public sub handler_objectevent(byval sender object, byval e objecteventargs)     if not objectqueue.isaddingcompleted         if not e.eventexception nothing             environment.exitcode = -1         else             dim itemtoadd object = nothing             dim itemqueued boolean = false                             try                     itemqueued = objectqueue.tryadd(itemtoadd, 0, objectqueuecancel.token) 'todo tweak enqueue timeout                 catch ex operationcanceledexception                     objectqueue.completeadding()                     exit                 end try                 if itemqueued                     itemtoadd = nothing                 else                     thread.sleep(0)                 end if             loop while not itemqueued         end if     end if end sub

the way of programmatically accessing objects in target use case through event listener, , while code executes has 2 pesky global variables. if define / dim blockingcollection , cancellationtokensource in main() sub, have pass them (i expect byref) event handler way of nonblockingproducer(). however, event handler's signature fixed, i.e. can't extend able pass variables in...

what "proper" way of refactoring eliminate global variables?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more