r - Adding values allowing a maximum number of NA values using dplyr -


i have this:

df = data.frame(month=rep(1:3,3),                  year=rep(1998:2000,each=3),                  a=c(na,3,2,rep(na,2),4,4,5,na),                  b=c(na,4,5,rep(na,4),5,6),                  c=c(10,rep(na,3),2:4,rep(na,2))) > head(df)   month  year   b  c 1     1  1998 na na 10 2     2  1998  3  4 na 3     3  1998  2  5 na 4     1  1999 na na na 5     2  1999 na na  2 6     3  1999  4 na  3

and want this:

   year      b   c 1  1998    5   9  na 2  1999   na  na   5 3  2000    9  11  na

the above means sum function allows 1 na value per year.

as first attempt tried: 

library(dplyr)     df %>% group_by(year) %>% summarise_all(function(x) sum(x, na.rm=t))

but got following output wrote na.rm=t:

   year      b   c 1  1998    5   9  10 2  1999    4   0   5 3  2000    9  11   4

my question is: how pass maximum number of na values sum function in order intended data frame?

i quite solved complicated for , if loops wonder if using vectorized functions.

any thoughts?

library(dplyr)  df <- data.frame(month=rep(1:3,3),             year=rep(1998:2000,each=3),             a=c(na,3,2,rep(na,2),4,4,5,na),             b=c(na,4,5,rep(na,4),5,6),             c=c(10,rep(na,3),2:4,rep(na,2)))  df <- df %>% group_by(year) %>%   summarise_all(function(x) ifelse(2 * sum(is.na(x)) > length(x), na, sum(x, na.rm=t)))  df$month <- null as.data.frame(df) #   year   b  c # 1 1998  5  9 na # 2 1999 na na  5 # 3 2000  9 11 na

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more