c - Break condition in iteration -


this question has answer here:

following insertion sort code wrote 

#include<stdio.h> #include<conio.h> void main() {     int i, j, a[10], temp, f = 0, k = 0;     clrscr();     printf("\n\t\t\t\tinsertion sort\nenter array:-\n");     (i = 0; <= 9; i++)         scanf("%d", &a[i]);     (i = 0; <= 9; i++)                  // 1st loop     {         temp = a[i];         (j = 0; j <= - 1; j++)               // 2nd  loop         {             f = 0;             if (a[i]<a[j])                      //  if loop             {                 (k = - 1; k >= j; k--)            //   3rd loop                     a[k + 1] = a[k];                 a[k + 1] = temp;                 break;                              // break statement             }         }     }     printf("\nthe sorted array is:-\n");     (i = 0; <= 9; i++)         printf("%d\n", a[i]);     getch(); }

i told break statement stops particular instant(nth time of running innermost loop & initiates next instance ( n+1 time). here confused whether break statement here stop 3rd loop or if condition. told affect second loop.

can here please tell me on loop going have effect.

the break stop loop, not if statement.

so here:

for (i = 0; <= 9; i++)                 // 1st loop {     temp = a[i];     (j = 0; j <= - 1; j++)         // 2nd  loop     {         f = 0;         if (a[i]<a[j])                   //  if statement         {             (k = - 1; k >= j; k--) //   3rd loop                 a[k + 1] = a[k];             a[k + 1] = temp;             break;                      // break statement         }     } }

, assuming i has value 0, when break gets executed, prevent 2nd loop executing again, , exit loop. result, go again @ 1st loop, new iteration start, i equal 1.

what describe suggests continue keyword, again has loops only, it's not affects if statement directly.

in code above, if continue statement used instead of break one, skip iteration (meaning nothing below continue executed), , move on next iteration of 2nd loop (giving j incremented 1 value). however, in code, there nothing bellow line, wouldn't make difference.

ps:

this comment wrong:

if (a[i]<a[j])  //  if loop  <-- wrong

an if statement not loop.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more