session - result contains no cookies when using result.withCookies -


please note: play framework newbie

intro

i need use session() and/or response().cookies pass data/store data.

at first session() started issue, cookies following along.

problem:

given basic example code below, have boolean value setting result, followed cookies being created , added result.

here on, mypage rendered, contains post action action within same controller, usercontroller

in new method, there no cookies. confirmed 

collection<http.cookie> cookies = response().cookies();

with size of 0

usercontroller

//... result result; if(b)     result = ok(mypage.render()); else     result = new mycontroller().index(); result = result.withcookies(         new http.cookie("id", "value", 86400, "", "", true, false, http.cookie.samesite.lax),         new http.cookie("id_2", "value_2", 3600, "", "", true, false, http.cookie.samesite.lax)     );  return result; //...

question:

the documentation states session() lasts entire duration while browser window open.

cookies stored client side , loaded when webpage loads, session regarded bunch of cookies.

why setting session() entries or adding cookies() shown above, cleared, i.e. no cookies available in response()?

what can for, remove session() or cookie entries?

well there no secret answer...

this not shown in question, cookies name or id may contain no spaces. causing problems. after removing spaces in name/id (values have spaces),

then issue resolved


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more