node.js - Sequelize, Issue with filtering on the join model for belongsToMany associations -


the sequelize docs suggest can filter query on join table attributes using following params on options object: [options.include[].through.where]

i've tried use formulation in code below , found filtering not work.

model user , model network associated through join table network-affiliations, has additional attribute (boolean) 'confirmed'. can't seem write query returns confirmed networks associated user.

my code excerpted below.

const network_affiliations = db.define('network_affiliations', {     networkemail: { type: sequelize.string },     confirmed: { type: sequelize.boolean } }, {     freezetablename: true,     defaultscope: {         where: {             confirmed: true         }     }, });  // user belongs many networks , networks belong many users (join table) user.belongstomany(network, { through: network_affiliations }); network.belongstomany(user, { through: network_affiliations });  //querying find 1 user, including confirmed networks user.findone({             where: {                 email: req.body.email             },             include: [{ model: network, through: { network_affiliations: { where: { confirmed: true } } } }]         })

i expect query return user instance associated networks -- networks confirmed: true. instead i'm getting networks associated user (including confirmed: false , confirmed: undefined).

as can see in above code, tried setting defaultscope join table ({confirmed: true}). appears not anything.

i've tried user.findall query otherwise identical, , not work.

what missing, or sequelize not working here?

sequelize version: "^3.30.4"


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more