AngularJs, Search one array against another -


so have 2 arrays, 1 looks little liek this

$scope.users = {id: 1, email: xxx} {id: 2, email: xxx}....

and have one

$scope.booking = {id: 20, regid: 2} ....

so users being displayed in table @ moment.

however if user has booking, want table row have red flag against (cant share table basic ng-repeat) if usersid exists regid in booking array, push user

any wicked

first of $scope.users , $scope.booking objects not arrays...

i make example how know if users has book, heres code , plnkr

the magic in foreach , loops.

html

<!doctype html> <html ng-app="plunker">    <head>     <meta charset="utf-8" />     <title>angularjs plunker</title>     <script>document.write('<base href="' + document.location + '" />');</script>     <link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css" />     <script data-require="angular.js@1.5.x" src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/angular.js/1.5.11/angular.min.js" data-semver="1.5.11"></script>     <script src="app.js"></script>   </head>    <body ng-controller="mainctrl">      <table>       <thead>         <th>id</th>         <th>name</th>         <th>has book</th>       </thead>       <tbody>         <tr ng-repeat="user in users">           <td>{{user.id}}</td>           <td>{{user.name}}</td>           <td>{{user.hasbook}}</td>         </tr>       </tbody>     </table>   </body>  </html>

controller

var app = angular.module('plunker', []);  app.controller('mainctrl', function($scope) {   $scope.name = 'world';     $scope.users = [     {id:1, name:'john'},     {id:2, name:'barney'},     {id:3, name:'moroni'},     {id:4, name:'adam'},     {id:5, name:'sam'}   ];    $scope.books = [     {id:1, regid:1, name:'book1'},     {id:2, regid:2, name:'book1'},     {id:5, regid:3, name:'book1'},    ];    angular.foreach($scope.users, function(value, index){     for(var =0; i< $scope.books.length; i++){       if(value.id === $scope.books[i].id){         value.hasbook = true;       }     }   });   console.log($scope.users);   });

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more