JavaScript (TypeScript/Angular): Shortest/Fastest method to set object keys/values based on previous logic? -


i'm attempting fill array objects objects same, , keys determined predefined item. know can multiple if...else, seems long method use , hoping more condensed and/or efficient without using external libraries.

current method fill array hardcoded objects:

fillarray(arr,n) {   while(arr.length < n) {     arr.push({         'x': math.round(math.random(),         'name': 'item' + arr.length + 1     });   } }

example of i'd achieve using if:

fillarray(arr, n, type) {   while(arr.length < n) {     if ( type === 'type1' ) {       arr.push({         'x': math.round(math.random(),         'name': 'item' + arr.length + 1       });     } else if ( type === 'type2') {       arr.push({         'x': math.round(math.random(),         'y': math.round(math.random(),         'name': 'item' + arr.length + 1       });     }   } }

in application use type of method dozen if items, , there similar methods well. not wish apply static typing these items, since application may require object keys dynamically added.

an idea had can't seem complete idea in head somehow pre-defining array of objects, , using find somehow apply each item in array type.

psuedo-code (untested):

mytypes = [{   type: 'type1', keys: ['x', 'name']},   {type: 'type2', keys: ['x', 'y', 'name'] }]; fillarray(arr,n, type) {   let currenttype = this.mytypes.find( mytypes => mytypes.type === type).keys   while(arr.length < n) {     // add loop iterate on each key/value here separately   } }

would type of method work, efficient, , reasonable practice approach? there other standard practices type of array population dynamic keys?

moving dynamic properties object keys harm type safety. since typescript primary language, important concern. also, keys doesn't allow control property values.

it can hierarchy of classes or factory functions:

class type1 {   x = ...;   name = ...; }  class type2 extends type1 {   y = ...; }  const typesmap = { type1: type1, type2: type2 };  fillarray(arr, n, type) {   while(arr.length < n) {     arr.push(new typesmap[type])   } }

the difference original code won't work if type incorrect or missing, may or may not desirable.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more