python - How to explain the reentrant RuntimeError caused by printing in signal handlers? -


code:

# callee.py import signal import sys import time   def int_handler(*args):     in range(10):         print('interrupt', args)     sys.exit()   if __name__ == '__main__':      signal.signal(signal.sigint, int_handler)     signal.signal(signal.sigterm, int_handler)     while 1:         time.sleep(1) 
# caller.py import subprocess import sys   def wait_and_communicate(p):     out, err = p.communicate(timeout=1)     print('========out==========')     print(out.decode() if out else '')     print('========err==========')     print(err.decode() if err else '')     print('=====================')   if __name__ == '__main__':      p = subprocess.popen(         ['/usr/local/bin/python3', 'callee.py'],         stdout=sys.stdout,         stderr=subprocess.pipe,     )     while 1:         try:             wait_and_communicate(p)         except keyboardinterrupt:             p.terminate()             wait_and_communicate(p)             break         except subprocess.timeoutexpired:             continue

simply execute caller.py , press ctrl+c, program raise runtimeerror: reentrant call inside <_io.bufferedwriter name='<stdout>'> randomly. documentation learn signal handlers called asynchronously, , in case 2 signals sigint(ctrl+c action) , sigterm(p.terminate()) sent @ same time, causing race condition.

however, post learn signal module doesn't execute signal handler inside low-level (c) handler. instead, it sets flag, , interpreter checks flag between bytecode instructions , invokes python signal handler. in other words, while signal handlers may mess control flow in main thread, bytecode instruction atomic.

this seems contradict result of example program. far concerned, print , implicit _io.bufferedwriter both implemented in pure c, , calling print function should consume 1 bytecode instruction (call_function). confused: within 1 uninterrupted instruction on 1 thread, how can function reentrant?

i'm using python 3.6.2.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

android - InAppBilling registering BroadcastReceiver in AndroidManifest -

i'm implementing inapp billing in android app. works well, however, i'm trying decouple broadcast receiver activity manifest. suggestion in android's trivialdrive sample: // important: dynamically register broadcast messages updated purchases. // register receiver here instead of <receiver> in manifest // because call getpurchases() @ startup, therefore can ignore // broadcasts sent while app isn't running. // note: registering listener in activity bad idea, done here // because sample. regardless, receiver must registered after // iabhelper setup, before first call getpurchases(). currently there's class extends broadcastreceiver : public class iabbroadcastreceiver extends broadcastreceiver { /** * intent action receiver should filter for. */ public static final string action = "com.android.vending.billing.purchases_updated"; private final iabbroadcastlistener mlistener; public iabbroadcastreceiver(iabbroadcastlistener listener) { m...
Read more

python Tkinter Capturing keyboard events save as one single string -

is possible store keyboard events 1 string? code below stores 1 char , prints it. card reader or bar code reader, contains collection of character/ string not 1 character @ time. goal save char pressed text variable. from tkinter import * root = tk() def key(event): text= event.char text+= event.char print ("pressed", text) def callback(event): frame.focus_set() print ("clicked at", event.x, event.y) frame = frame(root, width=100, height=100) frame.bind("<key>", key) frame.bind("<button-1>", callback) frame.pack() root.mainloop() currently, creating text variable , everytime key() function gets called, , text stores last character typed. you can define text module level variable , , use module level text inside key function - text = '' def key(event): global text text+= event.char print("pressed", text)
Read more

sql server - Why does Linq-to-SQL add unnecessary COUNT()? -

here tables: create table customer ( cid int primary key, name varchar(32) ) create table ord ( oid int primary key, cid int foreign key references customer, address varchar(20) ) here's linq-to-sql statement: var aaa = c in db.customer select new { c, o = c.ord.tolist() }; and here's inexplicable query generated linq-to-sql: select [t0].[cid] [cid], [t0].[name] [name], [t1].[oid] [oid], [t1].[cid] [cid2], [t1].[address] [address], (select count(*) [dbo].[ord] [t2] [t2].[cid] = [t0].[cid]) [value] [dbo].[customer] [t0] left outer join [dbo].[ord] [t1] on [t1].[cid] = [t0].[cid] order [t0].[cid], [t1].[oid] i want understand how rid of count(*) part. it's entirely uncalled for! linq needs count(*) in order determine number of entries returned o = c.ord.tolist() .
Read more